The employer retirement match appears to be on the rebound

Your future retirement plans may be getting a bit brighter, despite the topsy-turvy stock market.

A new analysis from consulting firm Towers Watson finds that three-fourths of companies that had stopped providing matching 401(k) contributions during the height of the recession have since reinstated them.

A matching contribution generally means that if an employee puts some of their salary away in a retirement account, then the employer will match a certain percentage of that employee’s contribution.

For employees, it’s a good deal because it essentially amounts to free additional money in your retirement fund. But during the recession and aftermath, Towers Watson said about 13 percent of employers appeared to look at it as an extra perk that they could cut to save money.

Towers Watson originally looked at employer matches for retirement accounts back in 2009, as part of a larger study on how companies were responding to the recession. They found that 231 companies had stopped matching retirement funds, and 29 had reduced that benefit.  

The vast majority of the companies who canceled matching retirement plan contributions did so in the first half of 2009.

Then, as economic conditions began to improve, companies started bringing the benefit back.

Towers Watson was able to get information for 205 of the 231 companies that told them back in 2009 that that they had stopped making contributions. Three-fourths of those companies said they’d brought the benefit back.

Towers Watson found that most companies reinstated the match at the same rate they’d offered previously. But about 2 in 10 reduced the amount, and a handful actually improved the matching benefit.

Of the 29 companies who said they’d reduced their matching benefit, Towers Watson said about one-third had returned to pre-recession matching levels.

The sample Towers Watson used came from a wide variety of industries, including manufacturing, health care, automotive and technology.

Does your employer match some of your retirement plan contributions?

Results with 19 short comments
Total of 3,615 votes - click on the "Display Comments" bar below to sort comments

77.4%
Yes
2,799 votes
21.9%
No
792 votes
0.7%
I don't know
24 votes
Display Comments:
No

work for state and the legislature is not a people group.

     - 1:04 pm EDT on Wed Nov 2, 2011
    Yes

    75c per $1.00 for 1st 8%

       - 1:04 pm EDT on Wed Nov 2, 2011
      Yes

      6% of gross salary, with a 3% gross bonus at the end of the FY, regardless of contribution. I'm contributing 12%, they're doing 9%.

         - 1:22 pm EDT on Wed Nov 2, 2011
        Yes

        i'm glad and making the most of it

           - 1:23 pm EDT on Wed Nov 2, 2011
          No

          Two years ago they had matching contributions. Last year they discontinued it. This year they said they'd reinstate it, then didn't.

             - 1:30 pm EDT on Wed Nov 2, 2011
            No

            Layoff. Had to take job without matching. Company rich. Just cheap. Health benefits sad, too. High unemployment so they can hurt us.

            • 1 vote
             - BBonnet
             - 1:39 pm EDT on Wed Nov 2, 2011
            Yes

            It's a supplement to our pension.

               - 1:45 pm EDT on Wed Nov 2, 2011
              Yes

              1 for 1 for first 8% of salary. Very generous.

                 - Ron C.
                 - 1:57 pm EDT on Wed Nov 2, 2011
                Yes

                I'm somewhat lucky. My company matches 100% up to 5%. The downside is that my premiums will be going up in Jan by 15%.

                   - 3:54 pm EDT on Wed Nov 2, 2011
                  Yes

                  Our company gives 12 percent regardless if you contribute 0% or 15%. same percentage to every employee.

                     - 4:19 pm EDT on Wed Nov 2, 2011
                    Yes

                    It's not much but it's something.

                       - 4:58 pm EDT on Wed Nov 2, 2011
                      No

                      I work for a small city now and i am vested but can not actually retire until i am 55 i do have a supplemental retirement i pay into.

                         - 5:16 pm EDT on Wed Nov 2, 2011
                        Yes

                        Yes - they provide all employees with 4% base, match employee's first 6% at 100%, provide additional %'s for years of service, age, etc.

                           - bmccue
                           - 5:16 pm EDT on Wed Nov 2, 2011
                          Yes

                          401(k)s are simply another way of saying, "I'll never retire." Guess pensions were too good for my generation....

                             - JohnS77
                             - 5:31 pm EDT on Wed Nov 2, 2011
                            No

                            My employer offers no retirement plans at all.

                               - Pinget
                               - 9:32 pm EDT on Wed Nov 2, 2011
                              Yes

                              I get a 50% match on the first 8% I put in. I'm lucky I still got a pension plan too before the company scrapped it for new hires.

                                 - TraceyG
                                 - 6:54 am EDT on Thu Nov 3, 2011
                                No

                                Why should they? Its an every-man-for-himself-dog-eat-dog-get-sick-and-die-quick conservative country.

                                We ate the dog.

                                   - 7:29 am EDT on Thu Nov 3, 2011
                                  No

                                  Hasn't matched for two-plus years. Waiting for economy to improve then is supposed to match 6% again.

                                     - ifly430
                                     - 8:51 am EST on Sun Nov 6, 2011
                                    Yes

                                    Just not enough

                                       - 8:36 am EST on Tue Nov 15, 2011

                                      Discuss this post

                                      People think matching employer contributions are fair but that teachers, who obviously get no employer matches at all, unfairly get pensions for which many pay more into than they pay into FICA.

                                        Reply#1 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 1:50 PM EDT

                                        Mick you clearly do not understand the difference between a pension and matching 401K. a company matching your 401K has a one time payout to that employee for that year. A pension is paid out till that person dies.

                                          #1.1 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 4:23 PM EDT

                                          I know of one school district that provides a pension with funds paid in by both the employee and the school district, and a 403(b) with the school district paying in a match to employee contributions up to a cap. Nice deal if you can get it.

                                            #1.2 - Thu Nov 3, 2011 10:15 PM EDT
                                            Reply

                                            Will match up to 3 per cent, nothing if employee doesn't contribute. In addition, have a defined benefit plan. The company wants to shift money from the pension to the 401K to reduce their risk of refunding the benefit plan which they had to in 2008.

                                              Reply#2 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 2:50 PM EDT

                                              I always like asking this question...when did it get decided that the employer who rents your time for less than 1/4 of every month became responsbile for your pension, healthcare, unemployment and workers comp?

                                              • 2 votes
                                              Reply#3 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 3:44 PM EDT

                                              As far as I'm concerned, those things are all part of my compensation package.

                                              • 2 votes
                                              #3.1 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 5:17 PM EDT

                                              Ricky. it was decided because sometimes people live longer than employers will employ them and they still need to eat. I hope you don't bother anybody else with this stupid question.

                                              • 1 vote
                                              #3.2 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 10:46 PM EDT
                                              Reply

                                              When did everyone decide teachers are the 'ENEMY'? And big butt politicians are their friends? Amazing! Simply amazing!

                                              • 1 vote
                                              Reply#4 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 4:07 PM EDT

                                              Teachers are not the enemy. Pensions are the enemy.

                                              • 1 vote
                                              #4.1 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 4:32 PM EDT

                                              A.J. s, some people do not understand that a pension is sometimes the incentive needed to keep people from going to work in the private sector for higher pay. Other people put no value on education at all.

                                                #4.2 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 10:59 PM EDT
                                                Reply

                                                10% match on my yearly gross earnings

                                                  Reply#5 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 4:28 PM EDT

                                                  My company does 12% toward retirement regardless how much the individual contributes on their own. So a person who puts 0% in their 401K or 15% in get the same. One note I should add is that our company is employee owned with about only 3,000 employees.

                                                    Reply#6 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 4:28 PM EDT

                                                    I work for a small city that does not pay much if i had to live with out my other retirements it would be rough , i feel sorry for some of my fellow employees.

                                                      Reply#7 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 5:18 PM EDT

                                                      Rick: I always like asking this question...when did it get decided that the employer who rents your time for less than 1/4 of every month became responsbile for your pension, healthcare, unemployment and workers comp?

                                                      I disagree. I get a pension where I work, but I've been working there 25 years, and hope to work another 5. Our pay is below the industry average, so I see their contribution each month towards healthcare and funding my pension as part of my compensation.

                                                      • 2

                                                      • !

                                                      #3 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 3:44 PM EDT

                                                        Reply#8 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 7:44 PM EDT
                                                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.