E-mail updates
Follow on Twitter
Subscribe to RSS
The simplicity of the Sony A390 makes it a good choice for an amateur photographer graduating from a point-and-shoot camera.
By Kara Reinhardt, Cheapism.com
Kodak announced last week that it will exit the camera business after more than 100 years. The company produced the first professional digital camera more than two decades ago, pairing a single-lens-reflex camera body with a digital sensor. The result cost as much as a new car. Modern digital SLRs, once beyond the reach of amateurs, can now be had for less than $500. They may not bear the name Kodak, but they’re available from highly regarded brands including Canon, Nikon, Pentax, and Sony.
A DSLR (or digital single-lens-reflex) camera uses a mirror to let you look through the lens when composing an image, so what you see in the viewfinder is exactly what you get. These cameras are hefty compared with point-and-shoot models that fit into a pocket or purse. They typically come with a basic zoom lens but can accommodate a range of interchangeable wide-angle and telephoto lenses.
Camera manufacturers always brag about megapixels -- the more the better, right? Well, yes, high resolution does let you print large, sharp photos with crisp detail. However, digital SLR cameras typically come with at least 10 megapixels, which should be plenty for any basic photo task. Crowding too many megapixels onto a camera’s image sensor can actually compromise photo quality, and the sensors on budget DSLRs are smaller than those on pricier full-frame DSLRs and traditional 35 mm film cameras. There are two different types of image sensors: CCD and CMOS. CCD sensors tend to cost more and yield better photos, but CMOS technology is catching up in terms of quality. Camera makers often use CMOS sensors in budget DSLRs to keep costs down, but CCD sensors are also available at this price.
Image stabilization helps keep photos from turning out blurry when you shoot in low light without a flash, which requires a slow shutter speed and a perfectly steady hand. Pay attention to whether this feature is built into the lens or into the camera itself, in which case it will always be there no matter what lens you use. Depending on the brand, you may have to pay a bit more for lenses with image stabilization. Live view mode lets you frame up a shot on an LCD screen on the back of the camera rather than looking through the viewfinder -- a process familiar to consumers who are used to point-and-shoot cameras.
Below are Cheapism’s top picks for affordable DSLR cameras.
- The Canon EOS Rebel T3 (starting at $433) delivers unbeatable image quality for its price, according to expert and consumer reviews. It has a CMOS image sensor, 12.2 mp resolution, and live view. Image stabilization is built into the lens. (Where to buy)
- The Sony A390 (starting at $420) impresses with a CCD image sensor, 14.2 mp resolution, live view, and internal image stabilization. Experts and users note that it’s easy to operate, and thus an appealing choice for photography enthusiasts making the jump to a DSLR from a point-and-shoot. (Where to buy)
- The Nikon D3000 (starting at $450) is a solid budget offering from a brand with an excellent reputation, reviewers say. Although this 10.2 mp camera lacks live view and internal image stabilization, it captures sharp photos with a CCD image sensor. (Where to buy)
More from Cheapism:
Cheap DSLRs
Best clarifying shampoo
Best lipstick
Cheap microwaves
Leave a Comment:
Bah! Why waste my money! I'll stick with my Canon F1n. Still works after all these years, more than I can say for the newer toys.
Are you really the most appropriate person to be writing an article about DSLRs?
1. If CCDs are so much better, how is it that a large amound of very low end point and shoot cameras use CCDs, and BOTH Canon and Nikon's high end pro DSLRs use CMOS? Face it, CMOS is not what it used to be, and it can deliver a very high quality image now. The reality is that it just depends on the application and on the quality of the sensor which is better. The fact that high end DSLRs use CMOS shows your whole statement about CCDs vs CMOS is VERY misleading.
2. CMOS sensors are amazing, and many times they are the better choice. Either way though, CCD or CMOS, the issue is QUALITY and SIZE of the image sensor that is the key here. The size of the image sensor is extremely important because bigger sensors are exposed to more light and can usually do better in low light. Smaller sensors often do well in daytime though, and have more zoom than big sensors, when combined with the same optics.
3. Megapixels are not the only measure of quality. Low light performance, features, overall quality of images all play key roles, among other things. A comparison of strengths and weaknesses of these individual cameras performance, rather than just a quick mention of their specs would be more informative.
4. Really, if people are looking for a DSLR under $500 bucks, maybe you should compare them with the real competitors, high end point and shoot cameras. Why get these rather than high end point and shoots? What are the key differences here?
5. KODAK IS NOT A MANUFACTURER OF HIGH END QUALITY DSLR CAMERAS! Nikon and Canon are the key players here. Kodak is more or less a joke now. You cannot even seriously compare Pentax and Sony with Kodak, so how is it that you are writing that "they may not bear the name Kodak"?
MSNBC, please get someone who knows about cameras to write a camera article. I could do a better job, so how is it, that this person who obviously knows little about them is writing an article for you? It cheapens your image and shows that you put out low quality articles that are grossly inaccurate and are of very little help compared to what they could be. Shame on you.